Judith Kirby wearing a nineteenth century style dress in the former residence of Peter Spring on Chestnut Street, 1949 Mar. 2. (San Francisco Public Library)
“In one of the bedrooms of the Nixon house on Chestnut-st., which will be one of six local residences shown on a centennial home tour Wednesday by the Women’s Architectural League, Judith Kirby catches the spirit of last century San Francisco living by stretching her toes for a glimpse of herself in a hoop-skirted gown of that era. The house was purchased by Peter Spring from the Eduoard family some time in the 1860’s and was known for years as ‘Spring Garden.’ It was taken over by Bruce Porter from Mr. Spring’s heirs in 1918 and subsequently remodeled. The late Mrs. Doris Ryer Nixon became its owner seven years ago, and at that time it was restored as nearly as possible to its original design and interior decoration.”.
As the subtitle suggests, Michael Bush has written this coffee table book about what it was like being the dresser / designer for Michael Jackson for twenty-five years: “his clothing was both reflection of and companion to his lyrics, music, short films [music videos], special effects, and tours; it contributed to a greater whole.” The book is a trove of spectacular photographs— including patterns, concert stills, fittings, designs in-progress, and glorious detail shots of intricate beadwork— accompanied by fragmentary personal remembrances of Jackson and the creative costuming process.
Dennis Tompkins and Michael Bush in their studio, 1992 (pg. 44)"The chevron and armband of the Ice Coat are made of vintage 1920s flat-black square topaz" (pg 99)
Michael Bush and Dennis Tompkins were in charge of the fit, function, application, and maintenance of Jackson’s wardrobe for twenty-five years. Though Bush suggests “magic” is involved in every step of the process, his tales of the unending hours devoted to researching ideas, presenting Jackson with outrageously intricate handmade prototypes or finished products, and then maintaining them during tours repudiates the presence of mystical forces. Bush and Tompkins labored to anticipate Jackson’s taste—they repeatedly dipped into his favorite themes of Peter Pan and Tinkerbell and his obsession with British royalty, essentially reworking the same seven patterns with different decorative “icing” to keep the looks fresh.
Reflective materials were key in drawing the audience gaze to Jacksons’ dancing hands and feet, simultaneously advertising opulence befitting the Prince of Pop: crystal rhinestones and semi-precious stones, silver, gold lame and actual 18-karat gold plate were favorites. Working with such high quality materials had the consequence of adding significant undesirable weight to costumes, and weight was critical: Jackson’s costumes needed to be progressively tighter and lighter over the course of a live performance to accommodate Jackson’s exhaustion and water weight-loss, which could shave up to five pounds and several inches off his lean frame.
"The Lean Shoes in which Michael leaned live for the first time in Kansas City, 1988." (pg. 157)
Jackson’s penchant for form-fitting, heavily encrusted layers and athletic choreography challenged his designers. Bush would observe Jackson rehearse and reinforce invisibly pre-split seams with spandex, or add gussets in jacket arms to compensate for where the most stretch was needed.
The famous 45-degree ankle-bend in “Smooth Criminal,” inspired by the Tin Man, was only possible with ingenious costume technology. Tompkins strapped a boot halfway up Jackson’s shin to support and immobilize his ankles, and the soles of his boots clicked into hidden bolts in the floor for stability.
"The lean move on stage." (pg 158-159)
The famous rhinestone glove was originally leather and worn on alternating hands, but after the 1984 Victory Tour, it was made of more flexible spandex. When it settled permanently on Jackson’s microphone hand, the rhinestones were removed from the palm to avoid static interference of the rubbing stones; gloves “iced” in the round were subsequently worn only for photo shoots.
"1,619 rhinestones were the focal point of an iconic performance at the 1983 Motown 25 anniversary special, where Michael's moonwalk was born. After this unprecedented performance, Michael would forever consider the white rhinestone glove reserved for 'Billie Jean.'" (pg 34-35)
While most of his costumes were created from scratch, some staples of Jackson’s wardrobe were bought off-the-rack and then customized. Jackson would only dance in Florsheim shoes; having learned to dance as a boy in that brand, these were sacred to him. Bush wryly commented, “He could wear 18-karat gold leg guards and drape his furniture in Austrian crystal rhinestones, but don’t give Michael a pair of designer loafers.” Bush would merely replace the rubber soles with smoother leather, which would allow Jackson to moonwalk. Similarly, Jackson’s ribbed slouchy socks and waiter’s gloves were bought wholesale and Bush would deconstruct them, apply crystals, and re-sew them.
"These worn-out size 9 1/2 'dance shoes' from the Bad Tour have a piece of elastic on either side of the top part, which enabled the shoe to stay on when Michael danced and kicked." (pg. 54)
Though learning all these tricks of the trade was fascinating, I most enjoyed the fleeting allusions to Jackson’s past. Jackson had been in awe of Bush’s rhinestone applicator machine: as a child, little Michael had bent the tines around rhinestones on his Jackson 5 costumes by hand until his fingers bled, illustrating the depths of his childhood poverty and his father’s cruelty. In another rare but rewarding moment of insight, Bush writes that Jackson initially wore the Asian-inspired surgeon’s masks to avoid getting sick while traveling, but “After a while I think Michael felt safe behind the mask, so its function evolved to become more of a protective shield.” Bush refrains from suggesting that Jackson’s personal struggles with fame, race, and sexuality might have related to his permanent body modifications such as his numerous plastic surgeries, skin bleaching, and tattooed makeup, which, in fact, were not mentioned at all. The book is more geared towards casual readers and fans than dress scholars, who might find navigating the book for specific information challenging: the disjointed storytelling and chaotic chapter organization is neither chronological nor exactly thematic. That said, for the photographic evidence alone, this book redeems itself as evidence of Michael Jackson’s costume legacy.”
~Tove Hermanson
*Full Disclosure: This book was published by my employer, Insight Editions.(HV)
Actress Marilyn Maxwell cutting the ribbon at the opening of Chandler's Shoe Store in Stonestown Shopping Center, 1953 Oct. 19. (San Francisco Public LIbrary)
“GRAND OPENING–With a king-size pair of shears, actress Marilyn Maxwell severs the tape to open the new Chandler’s Shoe Store in Stonestown. Watching, from left, are Al Hoffman, store manager; W. E. Polley, sales manager for the Edison Brothers Stores Inc.; Henry Stoneson, developer of Stonestown, and Roy Haydel, executive supervisor of the Edison stores. Ceremony was yesterday.”
Recipients of the "Fashion Oscars" 1950 June 14.(San Francisco Public Library)
“For their work in bringing national attention to San Francisco’s apparel industry, these folk last night won ‘Fashion Oscars’ at a banquet of the Manufactures & Wholesalers Association. Left to right, front row, Cyril Magnin, vice president of Joseph Magnin Stores; E. C. Lipman, president of Emporium-Capwell Corp.; Miss Joan Bennett (who won a special award as outstanding representative of California fashions and spirit); J. L. Sherk, second vice president of the White House, receiving the award for Michel D. Weill, and Thomas E. Brooks, chief administrative officer of San Francisco. Back row, George De Bonis, vice president of the City of Paris, receiving the award for Paul Verdier; Sylvan Frank, president of the association, and Daniel Koshland, vice president of Levi Strauss & Co.”
Heather Vaughan: Who was your favorite person to interview for this project?
Natasha Rubin: “Deborah interviewed the vast majority of the living illustrators for the book; I contacted some of the new guard (e.g. Oksana Nedavniaya, Phillip Boutte, Jr, and Christian Cordella) for quotes. All of the interviews are pretty compelling. Julie Weiss is great to listen to because she has so many wonderful stories, I mean, she worked with Bette Davis!
Sketch from "Shampoo" by Pauline Annon on Page 95: "Courtesy of the Designer," (Via Los Angeles Times)
The interview with designer Anthea Sylbert about working with her illustrator, Pauline Annon, was fascinating in many respects. She had worked with her for several years, but knew so little about her personal life. Pauline is still alive, but didn’t want to be interviewed; she’s a fine artist and the Hirshhorn Museum in DC has collected some of her work.”
HV: Was there one sketch that you wish you could have included that you could not?
NR: “We were able to include almost every sketch we wanted, except a few due to various reasons. In addition to museums and archives, we were lucky to have so many generous lenders including collectors, designers, illustrators, and also the cooperation of auctions houses such as Christie’s, Profiles In History, and Heritage Auctions.”
HV: How has yours and Deborah Landis’ affiliation with UCLA changed the scope of the research you’ve been doing?
NR: “The support of David Copley has given us the resources to cope with the extensive research demands that all of these projects require. UCLA has provided us with a space to work, an academic community, and of course the UCLA name acknowledges the Center’s credibility and lends prestige. It has also increased our visibility in the costume design community, both nationally and internationally. The Center is now a clearinghouse for information and personal stories about costume design history. Every day I field more requests and calls of interest; it’s very exciting!”
Professor Deborah Landis, Founding Director of the David C. Copley Center, Teri Schwartz, dean, UCLA School of Theater, Film and Television, donor David C. Copley, and Nadja Swarovski, head of communications for the company founded by her grandfather.
HV: What can you tell me about how the David C. Copley Center for the Study of Costume Design at UCLA, and what it will be able to provide for interdisciplinary historians researching this subject? What sorts of materials and resources does it provide?
NR: “The David C. Copley Center for Costume Design is in the process of digital archiving, creating a visual database of film costume illustrations, first-person accounts, and scholarly research placing costume design in the center of a century of cinema storytelling. We also continue to offer opportunities to learn more about costume design for film through panels and lectures. We welcome questions from scholars and those interested in learning more about costume design history.”
Many many thanks to Natasha for being so generous with her time, and for providing many of the images in these two posts. To learn more about the history of film costume illustration be sure to pick up a copy of Hollywood Sketchbook: A Century of Costume Illustration.
Yesterday I had the unique opportunity to go to a Costume Society of America Meet – Up (an informal and free event giving CSA members the opportunity to mix and mingle with their fellow enthusiasts) at the UC Davis Design Museum. Organized by past-president, Jo Ann C. Stabb, we had gathered together to see Structures, Signifiers and Society: People and Textiles which happened to include a curators walk-through with Mary Schoeser, a UC Davis alumna.
Schoeser, who also has a beautiful new book out Textiles: The Art of Mankind provided an amazing depth to the exhibition — highlighting unique objects and connections within the UC Davis collections. Objects ranged in age, country, technique and quality. It included both hand and machine-made textiles intended for both the art connoisseur and mass market consumers. The exhibition included groupings of historic and ethnographic textiles as they related to environment, identity, and other groupings. In her walk-through, Schoeser drew fascinating connections between the development of the loom and the development of the computer; the rise of the QR Code and it’s connections to textile weaving; in addition to the links between brain chemistry and textile production. It was truly a unique experience.
Making the meet-up all the better were the people in attendance. CSA past presidents, board members, conservators, professors, curators, as well as current students in attendance made for a valuable exchange of ideas. Following the tour, attendees mingled in the hallway over two pieces of historic clothing and examined their ins and outs. Melissa Leventon and Meg Geiss-Mooney pored over the two garments (one from c.1917, the other from c.1894) discussing their ideas about their history while attendees listened in, hovering nearby and asking questions. It was a marvelous day, and a wonderful opportunity.
Structures, Signifiers and Society: People and Textiles is on view through March 18, at the UC Davis Design Museum. Below are some photos to further tempt you:
Veteran’s Building, Fourth Floor, MPD main gallery – Come see what treasures you could snap up for a great deal.
Thousands of theatre, dance, music, opera, musical theatre, and film-related books and memorabilia as well as exhibition materials, office and audio/video equipment, and other odds and ends will be available for purchase.
Guests will pay one admission each time they pass through the sale and can take away all they can carry in one arm load (does not apply to specially priced items).
Admission Prices
Members $20
Non-Members $25
Be sure to arrive early to get first pick of these treasures!
Museum members will be allowed in at 11 am.
The sale will open to the public from Noon to 4 PM.
Proceeds from the sale go toward preservation of the Museum’s collections.
Special Note: MPD sells only duplicates of material already in the collection, material donated specifically to be sold, or material which falls outside the scope of our collecting policy.